1996-11-26 - Re: IPG Algorith Broken!

Header Data

From: Omegaman <omega@bigeasy.com>
To: Alan Olsen <alan@ctrl-alt-del.com>
Message Hash: 766c6370cc13afe6e1518383e38c99b58180f5daf4a849cbd0de80061b2cebe0
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961125222418.81A-100000@jolietjake.com>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19961124120423.00dc1358@mail.teleport.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-26 03:28:53 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 19:28:53 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Omegaman <omega@bigeasy.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 19:28:53 -0800 (PST)
To: Alan Olsen <alan@ctrl-alt-del.com>
Subject: Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19961124120423.00dc1358@mail.teleport.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961125222418.81A-100000@jolietjake.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 24 Nov 1996, Alan Olsen wrote:

> >Actually, rather clever if you're trying to estlablish reputation.  Just
> >make sure you use the right key.

very true 

> Reputation is not the only reason to use a "name" with an anon remailer.
> Sometimes you want to post (and have a reputation) that is entirely
> seperable from your "real life" persona.  Maybe you have a job where being

Stay with one nym long enough and the opposite may become true.  I've used
this nym for so long -- though not in these circles -- that I elected to
associate my true name with it.  The nym had far more built-up repuation
that my true name ever would.  (Of course, that's all meaningless here.)

Besides, I *like* the nym.  There is that psychological component of playing
with an alter-ego.  A lot can be said and done behind the veil of a nym that
might not be otherwise.  While many see this a threatening condition I have
always viewed it as an advantage.  Furthermore, it is a somewhat ironic
avenue to truth.  Politeness is not always conducive to getting to the heart
of an issue; nyms have little need for politeness or sugarcoating.

> Cypherpunks is gated to a number of Usenet News servers.  (Teleport is a
> good example.)  It is also archived in a number of search engines.
> (Altavista if I remember correctly, is one of them.)  Someone who does not
> want their words to come back any byte them might just use such a method to
> protect themselves.

And I would assume another nym in such a circumstance.

_______________________________________________________________
 Omegaman <mailto:omega@bigeasy.com> 
  PGP Key fingerprint = 6D 31 C3 00 77 8C D1 C2
                        59 0A 01 E3 AF 81 94 63 
 Send e-mail with "get key" in the "Subject:" 
 field to get a copy of my public key
_______________________________________________________________







Thread