1996-11-30 - Re: IPG Algorith Broken!

Header Data

From: wichita@cyberstation.net
To: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Message Hash: 8e8f97cf6b9883f501fbf52cc6de2bbe47dd38d56f1abb398283203ac4f11fc3
Message ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961130040004.19278O-100000@citrine.cyberstation.net>
Reply To: <849030305.93656.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-30 10:05:10 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 02:05:10 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: wichita@cyberstation.net
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 02:05:10 -0800 (PST)
To: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
In-Reply-To: <849030305.93656.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961130040004.19278O-100000@citrine.cyberstation.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On , 25 Nov 1996 paul@fatbrain.demon.co.uk wrote:

> 
> > > Ahh... an OTP isn't unbreakable.  Its just so encredibly breakable that
> > > you never know which break was the correct one ;)
> > 
> > Note that Schneier says "perfect", not "unbreakable".
> 

More gobbledegook about nothing. Yes it is perfect and yes it is
unbreakable!

snip......
> 
> IPG`s algorithm is definitely NOT an OTP and Don Wood is a snakeoil 
> merchant.
>

Play it Paul, (or is it Sam, or fatbrain).

Never has one person said so much and said nothing,

Lead on McPuff(ery)

 
With kindest regards,

Don Wood







Thread