1996-11-26 - Re: Provably “Secure” Crypto (was: IPG Algorithm Broken!)

Header Data

From: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9190d76bb55cfadbdd089a9ab19afb13618aeb0375d986703978ffa220a9be4b
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961125222558.1418A-100000@gak.voicenet.com>
Reply To: <199611252028.MAA16855@vishnu.corsair.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-26 03:27:12 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 19:27:12 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 19:27:12 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Provably "Secure" Crypto (was: IPG Algorithm Broken!)
In-Reply-To: <199611252028.MAA16855@vishnu.corsair.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961125222558.1418A-100000@gak.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Mon, 25 Nov 1996, Dana W. Albrecht wrote:

> I'm interested in the current state of research (if any) on this topic.  
> Other than what John Young sent to the list some time ago about Lattice 
> stuff --- which is certainly far from prime time --- I've not seen 
> anything else.  I also haven't devoted a lot of time to looking.
> 
> Relevant pieces of the earlier thread are included below.
> 
> Comments, anyone?

Matt Blaze did some work on NP-complete Feistel ciphers.  I don't know much
about the details.  The paper is at ftp.research.att.com/dist/mab/turtle.ps

Mark
- -- 
finger -l for PGP key
PGP encrypted mail prefered.
0xf9b22ba5 now revoked

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBMppkIizIPc7jvyFpAQFzYQf7BM9AZR0I7FWEbnvtmBZPYiW4xUARRpTL
eqoeDuA474PMenN/iEYUTRilxfdvUycBgBXLav8RaE+ZYLUuqu3G5uixsM0iwT+5
3nma1/xtNwv9F420nacWDzzSFatg77/SnbsaJ6/EFROHgy8EAz/cie5cZEtCkPJe
s6BFEe32deHHCqlzFamoCE+8UOtyOtGeBtyX4prC/+RfUI0UMU6PXiD1LicvA5C7
cEE7/K4qb8ku7+3qcp1LE47iN0Icuy8xK9N3oX6B00XxwzYX7kqmV4wDRbE0DxcP
O7cmrE395Y+J2w4VenDMw65XLI6Cp1INK2Ev+3/c4Nf+FNaQ/I8jRw==
=xvkT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread