1996-11-17 - Re: AGA’S LIMITED VOCABULARY

Header Data

From: aga <aga@dhp.com>
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: a7089caa32dc5f446e17892d1b476f1760280f73fc3eeaa33698a3117febb88d
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961117112938.2235C-100000@dhp.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961117072848.20717D-100000@crl7.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-17 16:37:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 08:37:47 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: aga <aga@dhp.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 08:37:47 -0800 (PST)
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: AGA'S LIMITED VOCABULARY
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961117072848.20717D-100000@crl7.crl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961117112938.2235C-100000@dhp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 17 Nov 1996, Sandy Sandfort wrote:

> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 07:45:17 -0800 (PST)
> From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
> To: aga <aga@dhp.com>
> Cc: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org, InterNet Freedom Council <ifc@pgh.org>,
>     cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Re: AGA'S LIMITED VOCABULARY
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                           SANDY SANDFORT
>  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> 
> C'punks and others,
> 
> On Sun, 17 Nov 1996, aga wrote:
> 
> > Now just one moment cunt. 
> 
> Colorful, yet sadly ineffectual.  
> 
> > This ain't cyberpunks.
> 
> No, it's Cypherpunks (and others).  
>          ^^^^^^^^^^^

o.k., a fucking typo.  I make it often, because there
is also an alt.cyberpunks newsgroup, so what the fuck...

> > I never joined that motherfucking list. 
> 
> Perhaps you are laboring under a misconception.  Cypherpunks is
> about the use of technology to protect privacy.  Perhaps you 
> were confusing it with that other list you are on:
> alt.sex.yourmother.
> 

No, it is your mother I have been fucking.

> > If you want to talk to me, you dump the motherfucking list. 
> > That fucking list is a waste of time, and I ain't going to
> > reply to any of those assholes any more.
> 
> Let me guess; you weren't an English major, right?
> 

Hey stupid motherfucker, you still have the cypherpunks mailing
list in the header.  Don't you know how to listen?

> > If you want to talk to me, you go to the Freedom-Knights
> > or the InterNet Freedom Council ONLY.
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion.
>  

And ai am telling you that you get no more responses to any
commo with the cypherpunks list in the header.

dig?

> > What year did you graduate from Law School?
> 
> Irrelevant, but it was 1975.  More importantly, though, when did
> YOU graduate from law school?
>  

1975.  And my school was better than your school.

I was the fucking class President in Law School.  We
fucked on Library tables at Pitt.  Where the fuck did
you go to school?

> > Again, we dump the stupid fucking list, or I don't talk
> > with you any more.
> 
> Kind of funny that you included Cypherpunks in YOUR reply, but
> don't want me to.  I guess you prefer having a captive audience
> of your cronies.  "Freedom Knights" yeah, right.  
> 

no stupid, as I told you, I do not chop headers.
I just will refuse to reply to you any more.

> So given your above ultimatum, I guess you are going to weasle
> out of sharing your vast legal knowledge with us as per my 
> request.  To wit:
> 
> > > As a favor to me and other's on the list who would like to know
> > > as much as "Aga" does about the *common-law of cyberspace* I ask
> > > "Aga" to please share his knowledge with us.  For starters, a
> > > list of the most relevant appelate cases embodied in the *common-
> > > law of cyberspace* would be appreciated.
> 
> What a pity.
> 
> 
>  S a n d y
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 

You will have to contact the Law Systems Institute for the answers to
your questions.

no more stupid fucking cypherpunks list, PERIOD.

-aGod







Thread