1996-11-08 - Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?

Header Data

From: Matts Kallioniemi <matts@cyberpass.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: adc9de50d269ed4fac90574fa5685656d255da98d068cc89441d7c17e532729a
Message ID: <3.0b36.32.19961108144638.00a11c90@cyberpass.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-08 13:46:22 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 05:46:22 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Matts Kallioniemi <matts@cyberpass.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 05:46:22 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?
Message-ID: <3.0b36.32.19961108144638.00a11c90@cyberpass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 17:12 1996-11-07 -0800, jim bell wrote:
>Simple analogy:  Suppose you put two people into a room with a deck of 
>playing cards and a table, instructing "Person A" to build a house-of-cards, 
>and telling "Person B" to stop him from achieving his goal.  Who do you 
>think will win?  Obviously, the latter will win:  It's vastly easier to 
>knock such a structure down than to build it in the first place,  and all 
>"Person B" has to do is occasionally take a whack at the structure. 

What if Person A is better armed? Could that change the outcome?







Thread