1996-11-15 - Re: Members of Parliament Problem

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: Peter Hendrickson <ph@netcom.com>
Message Hash: b0efa5884516c28c8e22bf3afad390c2b7666d4d25ac7e87b7fb03c77c423990
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9611151034.A15706-0100000@netcom14>
Reply To: <v02140b02aeb235099c35@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-15 18:38:56 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 10:38:56 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 10:38:56 -0800 (PST)
To: Peter Hendrickson <ph@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Members of Parliament Problem
In-Reply-To: <v02140b02aeb235099c35@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9611151034.A15706-0100000@netcom14>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 15 Nov 1996, Peter Hendrickson wrote:

> At 9:32 AM 11/15/1996, Adam Shostack wrote:
> I've been toying with schemes that multiply the Ns from everybody's
> public key to create a new semi-anonymous public key.  The only
> problem is that in each case either identity is revealed or the
> person seeking semi-anonymously reveals their secret key.  So,
> I am not quite there.  ;-)

I think that Chaum wrote some papers on group signatures. I'll try to dig 
them out. But it probably won't be before Sunday.

--Lucky





Thread