1996-11-28 - Re: IQ and age

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: dthorn@gte.net (Dale Thorn)
Message Hash: c201458c656ddd372243b930cce45dc96ec5d42f327b843f6a9dc57bbd0d7840
Message ID: <199611280447.WAA23636@algebra>
Reply To: <329CFFB7.E37@gte.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-28 05:07:33 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 21:07:33 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 21:07:33 -0800 (PST)
To: dthorn@gte.net (Dale Thorn)
Subject: Re: IQ and age
In-Reply-To: <329CFFB7.E37@gte.net>
Message-ID: <199611280447.WAA23636@algebra>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Dale Thorn wrote:
> The biggest influence on IQ are the so-called "engrams" (fears, super-
> stitions, anxieties, etc.) planted in your brain early in life.
> 
> Some of this can be overcome with mental exercise, and awareness of what
> negative influences are holding you back.  Much easier said than done!
> 
> IQ as they attempt to measure it can probably be most easily explained
> as pattern matching skills. Unfortunately for testing, and although you
> can be every bit as intelligent at 70 as at 10, your pattern-matching
> skills change and evolve over time, so any given tests will only apply
> (more or less) at the age group they are optimized for.
> 

Would you dismiss strong correlations between IQ and success in life 
and academia as something irrelevant?

	- Igor.





Thread