1996-11-21 - Re: Anon

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: c6942c22ce2dde46cb23411b6138e9e07922e7f032471794c6257cae3b38b623
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961121010553.4194G-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <Dw3PXD33w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-21 06:07:33 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 22:07:33 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 22:07:33 -0800 (PST)
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Anon
In-Reply-To: <Dw3PXD33w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961121010553.4194G-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 20 Nov 1996, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 96 21:46:36 EST
> From: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Re: Anon
> rod@wired.com (Roderick Simpson) writes:
> > Who has made the strongest case _against_ anonymity on the Net that you
> > have ever heard? Someone intelligent and theoretical rather than trapped in
> > some child porn or commerce pov.
> Cypherpunks themselves are opposed to complete anonymity. They insist on
> being able to track down and silence whoever (ab)uses the remailers to
> distribute homophobic or otherwise politically incorrect traffic. Just
> search the archives for their advocacy of "identify escrow".

Actually, this is false.

We (if I may speak for "us") don't care who the spamer is, as long as they
shut up.

> ---
> Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
> Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures
Finger for Public Key   Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern
Vote Monarchist         Switzerland