1996-11-30 - Re: IPG Algorith Broken!

Header Data

From: wichita@cyberstation.net
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Message Hash: cb2c8eddb82118d3725821b7666c88f94c3e941527214169d98f84320f456502
Message ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961130015710.19278C-100000@citrine.cyberstation.net>
Reply To: <199611240241.SAA29110@netcom6.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-30 08:15:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 00:15:07 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: wichita@cyberstation.net
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 00:15:07 -0800 (PST)
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
In-Reply-To: <199611240241.SAA29110@netcom6.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961130015710.19278C-100000@citrine.cyberstation.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Sat, 23 Nov 1996, Bill Frantz wrote:

> >>I should have said "it's currently impossible to
> >>prove an algorithim unbreakable". :-)
> >
> >Or, more accurately, nobody credible has seen such a proof.  But, a
> >clever person might invent one.
> 
> I thought Shannon proved one-time-pads to be unbreakable using information
> theory.
> 
Shannon did, but Paul Bradley and friends(sic) proved that he/they could
brute force OTPs, its on the record, so I guess Shannon was wrong, Nes
pas?  Someone as certain of his facts as PB cannot possibly be wrong, or
did he say he was asleep - I guess so, he is obviously always asleep.

I also can prove that our algorithm cannot be broken. All you
have to do is to examine the algorithm and you will understand why it is
unbreakable. That is a lot of chutzpah, but once you understand the
algorithm and how simple it is to prove its unbreakability, then you will
understand that our claim is absolutely correct.

Unfortunately, many of you would rather beat your fingers on the
keyboard about the abstract than find out the truth for yourself. It
is really very simple. Again, I repeat, if you would like a free copy,
please send a e-mail request to:

                     ipsales@cyberstation.net

As for the algorithm, it is at:

                     netprivacy.com



With kindest regards, 

Don Wood






Thread