1996-12-31 - Re: Export proposal

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: Mark Johnson <mark@hercules.reno.nv.us>
Message Hash: 255ad6fa17049cfd60752c1b900bdded3ed0727cb355791b69c20e084ff68d47
Message ID: <32C85D32.3B07@gte.net>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19961230105806.006ac5c4@netcom13.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-31 00:25:43 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 16:25:43 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 16:25:43 -0800 (PST)
To: Mark Johnson <mark@hercules.reno.nv.us>
Subject: Re: Export proposal
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19961230105806.006ac5c4@netcom13.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <32C85D32.3B07@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Mark Johnson wrote:
> Lucky Green wrote:
> > At 08:56 AM 12/30/96 -0800, Dale Thorn wrote:
> > >What about a fax?  That has to make things more complicated, yes?

> > A fax is transmission in electronic form. Clearly banned under the
> > regulations.

> Is it, or is it ANALOG?

Part of the reason for the question is because faxes can be sent and
received with no commitment to paper.  I sort-of understand the focus
on "books" and other hard copy re: freedom of speech, but it seemed to
me the fax issue could be one point in a congressperson's mind in favor
of the notion that the line between paper and electronic/media has been
forever blurred (or erased).  Just a thought.






Thread