1996-12-31 - Re: Hardening lists against spam attacks

Header Data

From: “tmcghan@gill-simpson.com” <tmcghan@gill-simpson.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2e02d7088f59f357aa6d87f35244b035e8ab41268a18c8fb47edd0ca60af8fcb
Message ID: <199612311600.LAA21931@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-31 16:00:58 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 08:00:58 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "tmcghan@gill-simpson.com" <tmcghan@gill-simpson.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 08:00:58 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Hardening lists against spam attacks
Message-ID: <199612311600.LAA21931@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Toto wrote:
> {snip} the source of any excessive increase could be put on 'hold'
> until the system operator has a chance to check on the validity
> Bill Frantz wrote:
> > 
> > The Christmas attack against this list shows the need to develop lists
> > which are resistant to attacks.

...and how long has Usenet had 'moderated' newsgroups?

( only as long as there have been individuals with the time and 
patience to screen the volume of input, and exercise thoughtful 
discretion in selecting the 'worthy' postings.)

  How smart an 'automatic' filter can clever folks design?   

for(;;) {
ECM;
ECCM;
}



 
Thomas M. McGhan
tmcghan@gill-simpson.com
http://www.gill-simpson.com
voice:       (410) 467-3335
fax:         (410) 235-6961
pagenet:     (410) 716-1342
cellular:    (410) 241-9113
ICBM:        39.395N 76.469W





Thread