1996-12-23 - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? (fwd)

Header Data

From: Michael Gurski <mgursk1@umbc.edu>
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 699bad6ecb0f4008308677ecb3ca735746372089f91754d8f7ee3efcff2d6ad3
Message ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.961223111126.17296A-100000@umbc10.umbc.edu>
Reply To: <m0vc2qk-0002wCC@mirage.skypoint.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-23 16:14:10 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 08:14:10 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Michael Gurski <mgursk1@umbc.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 08:14:10 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <m0vc2qk-0002wCC@mirage.skypoint.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.961223111126.17296A-100000@umbc10.umbc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 22 Dec 1996, Charles Gimon wrote:

> Equifax does business by tracking reputations, as do all credit
> reporting companies. That's how a free market handles bad checks.

Yes, and if I'd *ever* written a bad check, it would be a different
story.  The weasel there basically said that because I'd made
purchases there in the past few days, they tried to contact my bank on
a Sunday afternoon....  (No, I don't get it either)

But that still doesn't answer whether or not a credit card can be
requested when paying by check.


--
|\/|ike Gurski  mgursk1@umbc.edu  http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~mgursk1/
finger/mail subject "send pgpkey"|"send index"  Hail Eris! -><-  O- |Member,
1024/39B5BADD PGP Keyprint=3493 A994 B159 48B7 1757 1E4E 6256 4570  |   Team
My opinions are mine alone, even if you should be sharing them.     |   OS/2
	    Senate Finance Committee Chair, SGA 1996-1997






Thread