1996-12-03 - RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible
Header Data
From: “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 8953c3d6bcd9a4de49d48173e8a36fc8223f2b02991b639153c9bf5ae93af9ae
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=Inference%l=LANDRU-961203145204Z-12520@landru.novato.inference2.com>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-03 14:54:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 06:54:04 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: "James A. Tunnicliffe" <Tunny@inference.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 06:54:04 -0800 (PST)
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=Inference%l=LANDRU-961203145204Z-12520@landru.novato.inference2.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> [...]Having said this, Johnson noise makes a superior noise source,
> if a physical source is desired.
>
> --Tim May
Yours makes NOISE? Impressive...
In this case, I guess entropy is preferable to atrophy, though. :-)
Tunny
======================================================================
James A. Tunnicliffe | WWWeb: http://www.inference.com/~tunny
Inference Corporation | PGP Fingerprint: CA 23 E2 F3 AC 2D 0C 77
tunny@Inference.com | 36 07 D9 33 3D 32 53 9C
======================================================================
Thread
Return to December 1996
- Return to ““James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>”
- Return to “Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>”
Return to “Wolf <dlchris@minot.ndak.net>”
- 1996-12-03 (Tue, 3 Dec 1996 06:54:04 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
- 1996-12-03 (Tue, 3 Dec 1996 07:38:17 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
- 1996-12-03 (Tue, 3 Dec 1996 12:53:34 -0800 (PST)) - Cool site - Wolf <dlchris@minot.ndak.net>