1996-12-02 - Re: IP address

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “Cypherpunks list” <unde0275@frank.mtsu.edu>
Message Hash: 899992c3a0b9cb4ee5bb017c7b0159a38fd77bf4d2e05a5001cfcf71ae06828d
Message ID: <19961202055418796.AAA68@rn240.io-online.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-02 05:56:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 1 Dec 1996 21:56:49 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 1996 21:56:49 -0800 (PST)
To: "Cypherpunks list" <unde0275@frank.mtsu.edu>
Subject: Re: IP address
Message-ID: <19961202055418796.AAA68@rn240.io-online.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 1 Dec 1996 22:23:30 -0600, Internaut wrote:

>What is the risk of publishing your dynamic IP address to a web page while you are on line?  How vulnerable is someone just connected to the internet, w/o any server running? What attacks are feasable? --Internaut

Well, if you are running Win95 (all) or 3.1 (w/certain TCP/IP stacks) your
machine can be locked up or rebooted at *any* time using just PING!

#  Chris Adams  <adamsc@io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>                 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)







Thread