1996-12-18 - More on Van Eck

Header Data

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ad9bdbbac008798dda3780a2c288b34f1674e776ee3ee1e07430e3d39bc54ccd
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19961218221529.0068a48c@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-18 22:19:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: More on Van Eck
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19961218221529.0068a48c@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Steve Schear has provided a 1988 follow-up article on
Van Eck's 1985 study of EMR snooping. It includes
a letter by Van Eck explaining why he omitted certain
information in the original article, and why his employer 
"classified" more sophisticated studies of "compromising 
emanation."

We've put up HTML and PDF versions:

   http://jya.com/bits.htm  (12 kb plus 2 images)

   http://jya.com/bits.pdf  (85 kb)







Thread