1996-12-26 - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards?

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: b05f0667fb0f2d80d5d3ad5c24717987050bc79b42ffad3a8f6e01020d990e5c
Message ID: <32C0995F.6569@gte.net>
Reply To: <199612250205.SAA17605@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-26 01:52:10 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 17:52:10 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 17:52:10 -0800 (PST)
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Legality of requiring credit cards?
In-Reply-To: <199612250205.SAA17605@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <32C0995F.6569@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


jim bell wrote:
> At 03:29 PM 12/24/96 -0500, Brian Davis wrote:
> >On Tue, 24 Dec 1996, Dale Thorn wrote:
> >Be especially carefully of structuring a $10,000+ transaction into
> >smaller transactions in an attempt to circumvent the reporting
> >requirements.  Doing so ("structuring a transaction") is a felony.

> Actually, this kind of stunt fully justifies whatever level of lethal
> punishment  that the public will one day direct at these thugs.  Look at
> what you just said, paraphrased by me:

[snip]

I was surprised at this "settlement" thing.  I'd sure like to get more
detail on that.  A pointer would be *most* appreciated.






Thread