1996-12-07 - Re: “Family Channel” of the Internet?

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b3f0afeb8af657b931e9f6f7e42889eab67f7a11fb288b8682ffc57d0dd258dd
Message ID: <yZykyD30w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19961206210712.0091fda0@gateway.grumman.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-07 22:52:53 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 14:52:53 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 14:52:53 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Family Channel" of the Internet?
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19961206210712.0091fda0@gateway.grumman.com>
Message-ID: <yZykyD30w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Rick Osborne <osborne@gateway.grumman.com> writes:
> >3) In general, how would you use crypto to ensure that your users only
> >connected to approved sites, regardless of the platform or browser
> >software they were using?
> I wouldn't.  It's not even a crypto issue.  That's like asking how you
> would use your tea kettle to peel this orange: sure, you *could* do it, but
> why?
>
> I think your pegged 'bogometer' had it pegged.

I think one come up with a scheme where the web access is through a proxy
server which doesn't let through HTML pages unless the contain a sort of
digitally signed 'G rating'.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread