1996-12-15 - Re: ITARs effects

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu (Peter D. Junger)
Message Hash: b97a05d012b11ac71a1d96c562f668a9c9068b22e0d41d1373fec94d22460256
Message ID: <199612150010.TAA02707@homeport.org>
Reply To: <199612141904.OAA07254@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-15 00:14:19 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 16:14:19 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 16:14:19 -0800 (PST)
To: junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu (Peter D. Junger)
Subject: Re: ITARs effects
In-Reply-To: <199612141904.OAA07254@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Message-ID: <199612150010.TAA02707@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Peter D. Junger wrote:
| 
| : This implies that putting something up for FTP == export. Holy
| : shit.
| 
| That has always been the position of the Department of Defense Trade
| Controls with respect to the ITAR, the only difference is that now
| it is going to be in writing.

	My understanding is that they choose not to continue
per^H^Hrosecuting Phil for putting the code up for FTP.  Thus, this is
a change.  Or did Phil not put the code up for FTP?

Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume







Thread