1996-12-06 - Re: Logos -vs- Vulis

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: logos <logos@c2.net>
Message Hash: c053189785fc65084e5ea8e2f4f7d0cfcde7fd35337e42fd81da4aef8187fd56
Message ID: <32A7E0DB.46FD@gte.net>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961205175325.29619A-100000@blacklodge.c2.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-06 09:03:20 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 01:03:20 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 01:03:20 -0800 (PST)
To: logos <logos@c2.net>
Subject: Re: Logos -vs- Vulis
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961205175325.29619A-100000@blacklodge.c2.net>
Message-ID: <32A7E0DB.46FD@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


logos wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Dale Thorn wrote:
> > I'm not opposed to paying some attention to decorum, but logic comes
> > first, otherwise, you won't have a leg to stand on.

> Reasonable minds can differ on this subject. I think decorum must come
> first. We must first stop 'shouting' before logic may be heard.

Easily disproved.  You can shout a logical proposition/exposition or
you can whisper it, it's just as clear and relevant (if it's really
logical) either way.

Decorum, on the other hand, is somewhat nebulous, which I suppose is
attractive to some....  If it doesn't "feel" good to some subscribers,
they'll ignore it, which must be your point, eh?






Thread