1996-12-02 - RE: IP address

Header Data

From: Internaut <unde0275@frank.mtsu.edu>
To: “‘Igor Chudov’” <Adamsc@io-online.com>
Message Hash: cfba156f19cf2047fc6cf0f165065b7336ee472d92cf73b2ebcfdcece805fdb4
Message ID: <01BBE040.DE540E40@s19-pm03.tnstate.campus.mci.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-02 17:08:13 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 09:08:13 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Internaut <unde0275@frank.mtsu.edu>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 09:08:13 -0800 (PST)
To: "'Igor Chudov'" <Adamsc@io-online.com>
Subject: RE: IP address
Message-ID: <01BBE040.DE540E40@s19-pm03.tnstate.campus.mci.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




> Adamsc wrote:
> > Igor wrote
> > > On Sun, 1 Dec 1996 22:23:30 -0600, Internaut wrote:
> > >What is the risk of publishing your dynamic IP address to a web page 
> > >while you are on line?  How vulnerable is someone just connected to > > >the internet, w/o any server running? What attacks are feasable? --> 
>> Well, if you are running Win95 (all) or 3.1 (w/certain TCP/IP stacks) your
>> machine can be locked up or rebooted at *any* time using just PING!
>Isn't is Unix that is actually vulnerable?
I tried pinging myself off and it didn't work; maby it has to be from a remote host.
	







Thread