1997-01-27 - Re: Censorship

Header Data

From: “Ross Wright” <rwright@adnetsol.com>
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 35cba0dba05e8f6280c9880e1ab4031d0c890a08ef7ff172743a0cf2b1eb16fa
Message ID: <199701271621.IAA17131@adnetsol.adnetsol.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-27 16:21:52 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 08:21:52 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "Ross Wright" <rwright@adnetsol.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 08:21:52 -0800 (PST)
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Censorship
Message-ID: <199701271621.IAA17131@adnetsol.adnetsol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On or About 26 Jan 97 at 22:28, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

> "Ross Wright" <rwright@adnetsol.com> writes:
> 
> > On or About 26 Jan 97 at 2:19, blanc wrote:
> >> > > >Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
> > > >>>Jim Choate wrote:
> > > >>>>>Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>irrelevant@nowhere.com wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>Dale Thorn wrote:
> > >
> > > It can be said 100,000 times, but it still comes out the same:
> > > Just as in "The only cure for bad speech is more speech", "the
> > > only cure for 'list-focus-drift' is more on-focus postings".
> >
> > THE PRICE OF FREE SPEECH IS TOLERANCE OF IDEAS THAT WE MAY
> > OBJECT TO.
> 
> Comversely, some people are willing to give up their own freedom of
> speech so as to silence others whose views they don't like. 

Who could be that stupid?  Why would they even want to give up an 
inch of their freedoms?

>They
> hope that they'll be censored less than their "enemies". 

A weak hope at best.  Once you start censoring it becomes a "Slippery 
Slope".

> But a forum
> can't be "a little bit censored" just like a woman can't be "a
> little bit pregnant".

You got that right!

=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ross Wright
King Media: Bulk Sales of Software Media and Duplication Services
http://www.slip.net/~cdr/kingmedia
Voice: 415-206-9906





Thread