1997-01-23 - Re: Fighting the cybercensor.

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4595b55a61d28202ba51f0405e22194d44e7a38bc52f90a2539da31f701593f7
Message ID: <ePky1D108w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199701221225.EAA23456@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-23 01:01:20 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 17:01:20 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 17:01:20 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Fighting the cybercensor.
In-Reply-To: <199701221225.EAA23456@toad.com>
Message-ID: <ePky1D108w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Otto Matic <ott0matic@hotmail.com> writes:

> >From cypherpunks-errors@toad.com Tue Jan 21 16:57:46 1997
>
> >"Phillip M. Hallam-Baker" <hallam@ai.mit.edu> writes:
> >
> >> Mission:
> >>
> >> Singapore and China are blocking certain net groups. I think
> >> this is a bad thing, question is how can we stop it? The Web
> >> was conceived as offering despots and dictators a choice
> >> between remaining in the dark ages and allowing freedom of
> >> speech. Blocking and filtering schemes threaten this ideal.
> >
> >Phil, when I saw the subject, I thought this was another article
> >condemning Gilmore, Sandfort, and their disgraceful censorship.
>
> What's up with this one getting censored?  You didn't say cocksucker or fuck
> anything?

Alles Kriticismus auf der Listfuehrer Gilmore und Obercensor Sandfart
ist stricklich verbotten.  Heil Kocksucker Gilmore!

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread