1997-01-09 - Re: New Release: Universal Data Cryptography Module V2.0

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: DataETRsch@aol.com
Message Hash: 6e91a007d166878204ac23d0e5a52362cdd22a81211e2bf6318a7c754242a08e
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.970109022616.10573J-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <970108211056_1622671474@emout11.mail.aol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-09 07:31:16 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 23:31:16 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 23:31:16 -0800 (PST)
To: DataETRsch@aol.com
Subject: Re: New Release: Universal Data Cryptography Module V2.0
In-Reply-To: <970108211056_1622671474@emout11.mail.aol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.970109022616.10573J-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 8 Jan 1997 DataETRsch@aol.com wrote:

> Integrated Mathematical Data Manipulation and Positioning. Extensive research
> shows that IMDMP is more advanced than DES, RSA, IDEA, and PGP.

What research?
What is "extensive?"
What is "more advanced?"

> 
> UDCM (the IMDMP algorithm)...

> o Is more advanced than all of the industry standard encryption algorithms.

By who's standard?

> o Allows encryption keys as large as 256 bytes (2048 bits).

As if these directly correlate.

> o Includes 18 sub-algorithms.

The purpose of which is...?

> o Allows multiple encryption layer levels.

What encryption doesn't?

> o Has absolutely no back-doors or magical keys.

Says who?

> o Processes files as large as 2,147,483,390 bytes.

Why is there a limit?

--
Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures
Finger for Public Key   Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern
Vote Monarchist         Switzerland






Thread