1997-01-05 - [Fwd: Re: Experiments on Mailing Lists]

Header Data

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8e31ddffcb71f54649796b92dac5830a5d13095bffdee4f62a0f8fb45a1cd303
Message ID: <32CF4B4B.FC3@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-05 05:10:14 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 21:10:14 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 21:10:14 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Experiments on Mailing Lists]
Message-ID: <32CF4B4B.FC3@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: message/rfc822


To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Experiments on Mailing Lists
From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 22:32:46 -0800
Organization: TOTO Enterprises
References: <v03007800aef47653557a@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply-To: toto@sk.sympatico.ca

Timothy C. May wrote:
 
> Another possibility is that anonymous posts get kicked into a file for
> later approval or nonapproval by someone. Nothing fancy (that is, no
> "tokens" and complicated accounting systems, such as have been proposed),
> just a manual "moderation" by someone, or some set of volunteers, etc.
> Enough moderation to let the "Red Rackham" sorts of good posts through
> while blocking the "Make Money Fast" and barnyard insults from making it.

  I don't think it would take an extraordinary amount of brainpower for
someone to be able to figure out that a posting with a subject heading,
"Make Big $$$" is auto-spam, and put it out of its misery.
  And 500 messages titled, "How about them Lakers, huh?" would probably
also be fairly easy for even the slow-of-wit to spot as
cyber-hemmeroids.
  If I am denied hearing about a new cryptography scheme because the
author of it named it, "How about them Lakers, huh?", I am sure that
it would be a loss that I could live with.

Toto









Thread