1997-01-04 - Re: Modified Token Posting Scheme

Header Data

From: roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Message Hash: b4230955e1bf3c3ddcb2b2fdde056ae07d1d6fd6fc2fb71131cc84d9e30ed3c0
Message ID: <970104.021030.1j3.rnr.w165w@sendai.scytale.com>
Reply To: <v02140b00aef397cb9933@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-04 09:34:54 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 01:34:54 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 01:34:54 -0800 (PST)
To: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Subject: Re: Modified Token Posting Scheme
In-Reply-To: <v02140b00aef397cb9933@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <970104.021030.1j3.rnr.w165w@sendai.scytale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In list.cypherpunks, ph@netcom.com writes:

> In essence, the poster is betting that the moderator will approve
> the post retroactively.

> The "moderator" returns the money to people when posts are worthwhile
> and keeps it otherwise.

> Of course, there's no reason to have just one moderator on the list.

In the case of several moderators, who gets the ecash?  And doesn't this
open the list to bidding?  "Pass this message, and you can keep the
e$500."
- -- 
           Roy M. Silvernail     [ ]     roy@scytale.com
DNRC Minister Plenipotentiary of All Things Confusing, Software Division
PGP Public Key fingerprint =  31 86 EC B9 DB 76 A7 54  13 0B 6A 6B CC 09 18 B6
      Key available from pubkey@scytale.com, which works now

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMs4Q8hvikii9febJAQEbrAQAmgwAeqSsi2qIkqakNRPCpwCwNnYudNRi
SuPE2LueC+WuhugtLeyDDet+WgefE9X84F4qxn/QVB+tJAGbZzfCPO24shelXEyz
ngr0oevKqzcfAAzbB4tMtXe5gl6+zykExXjsx4J/KjMNPL0QAE490uvnKqus/aE8
mSlAU9k/KQo=
=ik7B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread