1997-01-06 - Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN….. (fwd)

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: roy@scytale.com
Message Hash: c9e5477eb04172b450bfb58d53bcb64c68adf13461a009cf7c15745acf699779
Message ID: <32D055E1.3598@gte.net>
Reply To: <970105.012718.4D8.rnr.w165w@sendai.scytale.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-06 01:33:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Jan 1997 17:33:08 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 1997 17:33:08 -0800 (PST)
To: roy@scytale.com
Subject: Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN..... (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <970105.012718.4D8.rnr.w165w@sendai.scytale.com>
Message-ID: <32D055E1.3598@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
> In list.cypherpunks, ravage@einstein.ssz.com writes:
> > Forwarded message:
> >> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 10:24:21 -0800
> >> From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

> >> C'mon Gary, why would anyone want to bother with all of this crap?
> >> Chip implants are already in millions of pets.  It's simple, cheap,
> >> and there's no work for the owner.

> I would really like to see some statistics on the number of "lost
> children" who have suffered (any given incommodation) exclusively due to
> their inability to be positively linked with some True Idendity.  Most
> of the English-speaking children with which I'm aquainted can answer the
> question "What's your name?".

Not my point. My point is, you make sure the chips are deep enough that
they can't be removed without removing a great deal of body mass (and
probably killing the subject).  The chip also has to be monitorable
externally, so that a number of transponders or whatever positioned in
many different places can isolate each chip and ID it, much like police
do with auto licence plates.

This way, it's vastly more difficult (or impossible) to operate the
so-called white-slave rings now sponsored by various elitist groups
and protected by corrupt police authorities.






Thread