1997-01-27 - Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d9f7b7298954a2a03c04ddfc8b916268edf8880a13ea35f5b7b1d51a03790b38
Message ID: <qN261D76w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199701270039.SAA01662@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-27 01:40:21 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:40:21 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:40:21 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
In-Reply-To: <199701270039.SAA01662@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <qN261D76w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


cypherpunks-errors@toad.com writes:

> Dale Thorn wrote:
> > 1. The subscribers have spoken by staying put, or,
> > 2. The subscribers are so lazy and unaware of what's going on that
> >    they've just left things as is.
>
> > Now, in my opinion, we've come to this:  Some people here will hold
> > the optimistic view of the bulk of the subscribers, and others will
> > hold the pessimistic view (the bulk will presumably be in-between).
>
> In case of 2, they are probably not worthy of your help.

I wholeheartedly agree.  By now everyone's painfully aware that there
are 3 mailing lists.  It's not my responsibily (or Dale's) to encourage
cypherpunks subscribers to do what I think is best for them - resubscribe
to cypherpunks-unedited.  Folks who choose to let Sandy choose what they
read and don't read should be free to do that.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread