1997-02-15 - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Message Hash: 01ba990385c68208106ecd91c30a2ee4c10ac1d167036b739b9f3651068fb661
Message ID: <199702150842.AAA07768@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-15 08:42:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 00:42:49 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 00:42:49 -0800 (PST)
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Subject: Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997
Message-ID: <199702150842.AAA07768@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


snow wrote:
> 
> Igor said:
> > I can suggest a scheme where a fee would be attached to the message,
> > and the recipient would be able to get the money only after having
> > read and understood the message.
> > 
> > For example, you might receive the following message (it could be encrypted
> > by your public key to preserve the cash from the MITM):
> 
> > do get them to read) will have a very high response rate. That may 
> > justify adding postage to their letters.
> > 
> > The advantages are obvious. The disadvantage is a possibility of someone
> > stealing the money on the way, if the letters are not encrypted.
> 
> 	That would be great. Sit home all day and hit web pages for a living.
> 

Well, they will stop sending you money if they find out that you do not buy
their products.

	- Igor.






Thread