1997-02-03 - Re: Voice Encrytion/Scrambling

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: cryptography@c2.net
Message Hash: 0b8487ff42a5f533c6346a88b517989c62d1b715d2dc19dda71d19789d285652
Message ID: <199702032011.MAA01002@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-03 20:11:17 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:11:17 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:11:17 -0800 (PST)
To: cryptography@c2.net
Subject: Re: Voice Encrytion/Scrambling
Message-ID: <199702032011.MAA01002@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 05:09 PM 2/2/97 -0800, Huge Cajones Remailer wrote:
>Can anyone comment on and give pointers to devices designed to
>encrypt voice transmission over POTS lines?  I am interested in 
>the respective sound qualities (if you've tried it) and
>relative strengths of encryption algorithms.

http://www.comsec.com/

Uses 2048 bit DH and 3DES. The voice quality is excellent.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred

   "I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and
    violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi






Thread