1997-02-13 - Transmission of Crypto material and ITAR

Header Data

From: Benjamin Grosman <bgrosman@magna.com.au>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0c9ddcddeabbb97807fb07568793b7d0cb98028661fd3b16543adb7327f31dcc
Message ID: <2.2.32.19970213211523.00d318c8@magna.com.au>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-13 02:11:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 18:11:42 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Benjamin Grosman <bgrosman@magna.com.au>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 18:11:42 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Transmission of Crypto material and ITAR
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19970213211523.00d318c8@magna.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Dear All,

I have a question regarding the impossible enforcement of ITAR/EAR:
Naturally I cannot download crypto software from the US, but most of these
sites have mirrors in other countries, such as the UK for PGP, and sweden
and finland for lots of things.

However, with the way that information is routed throughout the internet
from these sites, whenever I, in Australia, request packets containing this
data from the UK etc, it invariably passes through the US from coast to
coast! Therefore, if ITAR/EAR tries to govern that, aren't they really
trying to enforce something totally unenforcable? Surely they cannot expect
all gateways operated by, say, Sprint and MCI to packet sniff 'n' search? 

Can anyone tell me what the ruling is with regards to this?

Yours Sincerely,

Benjamin Grosman

----------------------------------------------------------------
  Benjamin Grosman - Programmer, Magna Data Internet Solutions
  Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
                  [Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.]
----------------------------------------------------------------






Thread