1997-02-12 - Re: Recommendation: Creation of “alt.cypherpunks”

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 13ba2c837f41491c61f023b242c12c209c657eca2195def17a6ef19a71e6973c
Message ID: <199702120321.TAA05381@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-12 03:21:08 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 19:21:08 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 19:21:08 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Recommendation: Creation of "alt.cypherpunks"
Message-ID: <199702120321.TAA05381@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> (Please leave my name in any replies to ensure I see your comments.)
> I talked to Hugh Daniel at the Saturday meeting about the creation of an
> "alt.cypherpunks" unmoderated (of course) newsgroup as a possible
> alternative (or supplement) to cypherpunks@toad.com. Greg Broiles and John
> Gilmore were there for part of the discussion, too.

     Might "we" get wider propigation with something like "talk.issues.crypto"
or "talk.cypherpunks"? 

> Charter for alt.cypherpunks: (suggested)
> "Alt.cypherpunks is for the unmoderated discussion of cryptography and the
> political, social, and economic implications of unrestricted, strong
> readers are strongly advised to learn how to use filters and other tools
> for making virtual anarchies manageable for their own tastes."

     Maybe a pointer to these tools?

> * Disadvantages

	-Mailing lists easily penetrate firewalls, while many places don't 
provide Usenet access. 

	Another possibility would be to create a "private Usenet" setting up
NNTP servers that _only_ talk to each other. This would eventually allow for
the same sort of redundancy that the "regular" usenet offers, provide some of 
the same efficient use of resources, and ease of use (almost) but provide some
protection against spammers & etc. 

	For those who don't understand, this is how it would work (and correct
me if I am wrong): 

	Usenet works by servers exchanging messages with one or more other 
servers it is decentralized and has no central authority (execpt the cabal 
--there is no cabal) inherent in the process. These servers are told _who_
they get their feed from/to, so it should be possible to set up another 
network of Usenet servers just to serve our purposes.

	As part of setting up the servers, they can be configured as to who
they From owner-cypherpunks  Wed Feb 12 08:00:24 1997
Return-Path: owner-cypherpunks
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA22396; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 08:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199702121600.IAA22396@toad.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 06:56:59 -0800
From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: whois cypherpunks.org ?
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Precedence: bulk

At 08:04 PM 2/11/97 -0500, John Young wrote:

[Trying whois]

Eric Hughes and John Gilmore are fouders of this list. Aleph1 is the
moderator of the famous bugtraq mailing list.


-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred

   "I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and
    violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi






Thread