1997-02-07 - Re: lead remailer is shut down

Header Data

From: bs-org@c2.net
To: zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Message Hash: 15d1c2256ae9bc630650b50501f4e8c5470b3005c893a9f10b9ffd664770d2db
Message ID: <1.5.4.16.19970207225648.2fff933a@c2.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-07 22:57:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:57:17 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: bs-org@c2.net
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:57:17 -0800 (PST)
To: zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Subject: Re: lead remailer is shut down
Message-ID: <1.5.4.16.19970207225648.2fff933a@c2.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:58 1997-02-07 -0800, Ed Falk wrote:
>
>Can't remailers be written with basic spam safeguards?  I.e. no mass
>crossposts, limited # of posts by each individual client per day, etc.?

Can anybody give me the address of reliable remailer which accepts
pgp messages.

BTW which remailer was shut down and why?









Thread