1997-02-12 - Re: Recommendation: Creation of “alt.cypherpunks”

Header Data

From: Anil Das <das@razor.engr.sgi.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 26c571d4ed5f5256b871087ce33d4f7c5b2f828799b2bc7944d3f90e3fa448f2
Message ID: <199702120211.SAA02828@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-12 02:11:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 18:11:13 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Anil Das <das@razor.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 18:11:13 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Recommendation: Creation of "alt.cypherpunks"
Message-ID: <199702120211.SAA02828@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Feb 11,  2:42pm, Alan Bostick wrote:
> new alt.* newsgroups are better
> received if they don't have top-level names.  Using existing top-level
> hierarchies is better (e.g. alt.security.cypherpunks or
> alt.privacy.cypherpunks).

I agree that alt.privacy.cypherpunks is the best bet, if alt.group
is the route we go.

--
Anil Das






Thread