1997-02-08 - Re: lead remailer is shut down
Header Data
From: bs-org@c2.net
To: Ed Falk <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Message Hash: 338c6ad777821af7e92a1b867173decd59623c3ba9e3c9d218dd57a20aed9385
Message ID: <199702080056.QAA05146@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-08 00:56:23 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 16:56:23 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: bs-org@c2.net
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 16:56:23 -0800 (PST)
To: Ed Falk <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Subject: Re: lead remailer is shut down
Message-ID: <199702080056.QAA05146@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:58 1997-02-07 -0800, Ed Falk wrote:
>
>Can't remailers be written with basic spam safeguards? I.e. no mass
>crossposts, limited # of posts by each individual client per day, etc.?
Can anybody give me the address of reliable remailer which accepts
pgp messages.
BTW which remailer was shut down and why?
Thread
Return to February 1997
- Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
Return to “bs-org@c2.net”
- 1997-02-08 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 16:56:23 -0800 (PST)) - Re: lead remailer is shut down - bs-org@c2.net
- 1997-02-08 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 21:44:01 -0800 (PST)) - Re: lead remailer is shut down - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>