1997-02-01 - Re: Intelligence Update (fwd)

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 4e36b5b71848d9ec43bae4836f0be84960425477089cf1e3e695aec2c21cff3b
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970131082753.006286c0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199701310745.XAA07140@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-01 04:26:48 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 20:26:48 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 20:26:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Intelligence Update (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199701310745.XAA07140@toad.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970131082753.006286c0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:11 PM 1/30/97 -0800, you wrote:
>>Note: According to a recently obtained DOJ surveillance training manual:
>>"The typical range for the 28 ghz devices is six miles, the typical 
>>range of the 2.4 ghz is thirty miles, and the typical range for the 
>>1.7ghz  is 44 miles."

How sure are you about the quality of your sources here?
I'd expect 1.7ghz and above equipment to require line of sight,
and even a range of six miles seems really high for a very low power
device - getting that as "typical" seems pretty unlikely.
Could all of these figures have been 6, 30, and 44 _meters_ instead? :-)



#			Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp
#     (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies.  Thanks.)






Thread