1997-02-12 - Re: STE_pup

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: John Young <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 521eb2bf85cfc559b2d6c8479def235d17d80fdb2726202fe6d9c0254d4a409b
Message ID: <199702120300.TAA04924@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-12 03:00:34 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 19:00:34 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 19:00:34 -0800 (PST)
To: John Young <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: STE_pup
Message-ID: <199702120300.TAA04924@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:39 AM 2/11/97 -0500, John Young wrote:
>  Oracle's new fingerprint checking device to assure bona fide
>  log-on privileges. Covers other such devices, quotes a maker:
>  "if criminals or hackers get through these, industry will
>  step up one more level."

Fingerprint readers tend to work regardless if the finger is attached to a
body or not. All that fingerprint readers will do is increase the damage to
those relying on ever increasing, but misguided, methods of authentication.
See the rise in "identity theft" since SSN's began to be used for
identification.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred

   "I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and
    violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi






Thread