1997-02-07 - Re: anonymous remailers

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7b7e52718c09db220bc81760ae8bfe7f2a76c87108d49f0b7a6afa5c5e5d1044
Message ID: <iJkq2D46w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <32fa39d8.16371604@mail-relay.internetmci.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-07 04:13:50 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 20:13:50 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 20:13:50 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: anonymous remailers
In-Reply-To: <32fa39d8.16371604@mail-relay.internetmci.com>
Message-ID: <iJkq2D46w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


c.musselman@internetmci.com (Charley Musselman) writes:

> C'punks --
> 	When I told a friend about the alt.drugs.pot cultivation newsgroup
> and suggested that he use an anonymous remailer to post to the group,
> he laughed and said, "Who do you suppose runs the remailers?  ATF,
> FBI, DEA, that's who!"  Gee, it makes sense to this paranoid.  Does
> anyone know the answer?  Specifically, how can we choose a trusted
> remailer?

Even if the feds are not directtly involved, the so-called "cypher punk"
remailers are run by people who should not be trusted.  Check out their
remailer-operators list: it's full of announcements that some specific
person posted something via the remailer that the operator didn't like.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread