1997-02-04 - Re: New X-Ray Imager

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Message Hash: 7ea76eb22df5e52ebfd5b63b4b8d6253080d1f593b051ffb255ef9354b42cbdc
Message ID: <199702041919.NAA08584@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19970204105556.00704204@192.100.81.136>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-04 19:25:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 11:25:04 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 11:25:04 -0800 (PST)
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: Re: New X-Ray Imager
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970204105556.00704204@192.100.81.136>
Message-ID: <199702041919.NAA08584@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Lucky Green wrote:
> At 10:38 AM 2/4/97 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
> >| A poll last week by the Los Angeles Times found that a majority of
> people --
> >| 58 percent -- said they would curtail some civil liberties if it would help
> >| thwart terrorism. Thirteen percent said it would depend on what rights were
> >| at stake. The poll didn't ask people to single out any rights.
> >
> >	Its worth noting the 'if it would help thwart terrorism.' 
> 
> It is irrelevant if terrorism is indeed be thwarted. The public does not
> require this to happen. All that matters is to generate the *perception* of
> increased security, not to increase security itself.

Let's remember though that perception of security applies not
only to passengers, but also to potential terrorists. If they *think*
that they would not be able to bring a bomb easily, they would be less
inclined to do so.

	- Igor.





Thread