1997-03-18 - Re: Technology and loss of freedom

Header Data

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 2820c5f77a0a72a2ed7ce09e49c72bb8822565a26106cc51f76f04b3270e3997
Message ID: <332E206D.626F@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: <v03007806af53c00a2e6b@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-18 05:30:32 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 21:30:32 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 21:30:32 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Technology and loss of freedom
In-Reply-To: <v03007806af53c00a2e6b@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <332E206D.626F@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Timothy C. May wrote:
> At 8:20 PM -0600 3/17/97, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
> >With the advent of technology, the balance of perceived social needs and
> >government capabilities shifted radically, and it shifted away from the
> >great freedoms of the past. The public perception of freedom now is that
> >freedom is inherently dangerous and is a threat to the public itself.
 
> What are these "great freedoms of the past"? Look to history.

  'Freedom' has always been buggered by the 'Great Exception'. The GE
generally rests on a foundation related to denying individuals the right
to 'abuse' that freedom.
  Of course, the definition of abuse has always followed a course that
might be compared to a mathematical relationship between the position of 
ladies hemlines and the number of denominations in the 'current' One
True Religion.

  Freedom exists not so much in terms of the current/individual
definition of freedom, but in the caliber of the weapon with which
one defends their own definition of freedom.
-- 
Toto
"The Xenix Chainsaw Massacre"
http://bureau42.base.org/public/xenix/xenbody.html







Thread