1997-03-25 - Re: remailer spam throttle

Header Data

From: Bubba Rom Dos <bubba@dev.null>
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Message Hash: 38e9ccad924bd55401817a4164e2c86af8d7a3831accf239d593673c8fe31b85
Message ID: <3337C3D9.17A@dev.null>
Reply To: <199703250150.BAA01138@server.test.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-25 12:22:47 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 04:22:47 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Bubba Rom Dos <bubba@dev.null>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 04:22:47 -0800 (PST)
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: remailer spam throttle
In-Reply-To: <199703250150.BAA01138@server.test.net>
Message-ID: <3337C3D9.17A@dev.null>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Adam Back wrote:

> With hash marks (##) "hash" capability remailers can already be made
> to do this, where it will work, but this could be made the default, to
> set the From to remailer@dev.null or whatever.  No answer is required,
> or possible via the from address (for mix and typeI), so why bother
> with a valid From field?

Adam,
  All remailer owners have full permission to use my dev.null
server as their From address.
  I have a highly efficient staff at my command and I can 
assure everyone that their replies will be discarded in the
order that they are received.

Bubba
"He who shits on the road, will meet flies upon his return."






Thread