1997-03-18 - Re: Market Failures, Monocultures, and Dead Legislators

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: toto@sk.sympatico.ca
Message Hash: 5f0228c924e4d69cadcf66de969b100a936407804ce066bcd935708b761d5357
Message ID: <332E45D8.74CC@gte.net>
Reply To: <199703170222.SAA07397@gulch.spe.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-18 07:36:58 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 23:36:58 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 23:36:58 -0800 (PST)
To: toto@sk.sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: Market Failures, Monocultures, and Dead Legislators
In-Reply-To: <199703170222.SAA07397@gulch.spe.com>
Message-ID: <332E45D8.74CC@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Toto wrote:
> Dale Thorn wrote:
> > The best reason to oppose air bags and seat belts is that they
> > protect the worst class of drivers (those who run into things,
> > as opposed to those who get run into), who should be killed
> > by their stupidity.  (Survival of the fittest, without govt.
> > interference).

> How about a law prohibiting legislators from wearing seat-belts?
> I think we could get a grass-roots thing going on this one.

In California, they have those infamous Prop-nnn's, and the exercises
the leg'os have to do to get around them could fill volumes.  Here
in the Land of Sunshine your son or daughter can begin their dream
quest in the fry section of the local McD's, then when they graduate
I.S. from Cal-State (Indentured Servant, $200,000 student loans),
they can move right on up to waterboy/girl for Barbara Boxer and
her mindless goon assistants.

To begin with, all politicians should be required to ride around in
limos with the top down.  If it rains, let 'em use umbrellas.  The
guys standing by the road watching will be smart enough to bring their
umbrellas [hee hee].






Thread