1997-03-22 - Remailers: Free vs. Fee

Header Data

From: (Alec)camcc@abraxis.com
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 789cd53c53df6d6fac051d1cdd452648614f69469230aa476d995c77e3c6021c
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970322175306.007ca580@smtp1.abraxis.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-22 23:12:42 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 15:12:42 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: (Alec)camcc@abraxis.com
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 15:12:42 -0800 (PST)
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Remailers: Free vs. Fee
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970322175306.007ca580@smtp1.abraxis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

A question for those legally-minded list members.

Poorly put:

Does the requirement an individual pay a fee (or the acceptance of a fee) for
remailing services create a liability on the part of the remailer in regard
to the content of the message?

Or, if the service is free does the remailer have less risk than if he
charged for it?

Alec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.5

iQCVAgUBMzRiyyKJGkNBIH7lAQHaxwP/Z73JUcG9qqS2cvvSGzforGEWstlRUv8v
N9p6XUmoYoR2wo+D2wzmWsI8suIPGOwBHV5aKAds/tfJtzoPEQ7iEszREBpK1afT
6/D+KtEo1+Q0NNC8eatiJELvwqGUBBjzRXL1QP95fMQXoP0Gk70HjFZegLYWw7Fx
FSUS/XKny/g=
=sdLH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread