1997-03-21 - Re: Market Failures, Monocultures, and Dead Kids (Oh My!)

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Message Hash: 8be5457ae656c5f9c45e16299e85c72606c23ff979fe197db42b968ffe81be86
Message ID: <199703210624.AAA00738@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <s8VT4D2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-21 06:02:38 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 22:02:38 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 22:02:38 -0800 (PST)
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Subject: Re: Market Failures, Monocultures, and Dead Kids (Oh My!)
In-Reply-To: <s8VT4D2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <199703210624.AAA00738@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Vulis wrote:
> Out in the hobbsian wild, if the parents abuse their offsprings (kill them,
> fail to train them), then the offsprings won't reproduce and the parent's
> genes won't perpetuate.  Do we really need a more coersive system of
> punishing "child abuse"?

	We don't (yet) live in the "hobbsian wild". Children do what they are 
taught. If the are taught to react to the slightest provocation with violence,
then they will, when they grow up (notice I didn't say mature), react similarly.
If we wish to live in a society of reasonable people, our children need to 
be raised respond reasonably to provocation. This means get violent when, and
only when necessary. 

	So, yes. I would say we need a fairly coersive system for punishing 
child abuse. We also need a clear defination of what child abuse really is.






Thread