1997-03-23 - Re: Remailers & Linux Dis

Header Data

From: harka@nycmetro.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a8e539f0f66e256d818bb7e1acc799455f7b982628adf3443c29e93f5a1b5414
Message ID: <TCPSMTP.17.3.23.5.6.26.2780269260.1581987@nycmetro.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-23 09:59:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 01:59:33 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: harka@nycmetro.com
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 01:59:33 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailers & Linux Dis
Message-ID: <TCPSMTP.17.3.23.5.6.26.2780269260.1581987@nycmetro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

 -=> Quoting In:alan@ctrl-alt-del.com to Harka <=-

 In> I think that the actual thing preventing ISPs from setting up
 In> remailers is more of a liability issue, as opposed to a
 In> technical one.

Absolutely. When I asked my ISP to implement a remailer in the Linux
sub system, they said "You mean, OUR Linux??" "NO WAY!!".
People are simply afraid of possible liability suits. Therefore
remailers should rather be viewed as a problem solved by individuals
(not ISP's) and lot's of them...

Ciao

Harka
___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 [NR]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAgUBMzT+rDltEBIEF0MBAQGQegf+IuKRoNx98Vss2GkcIVHY7Nfgo4xQVozy
XO15FOj0G5BiyoaONxjGJonHPom5fhXbgY74quZOmSD5UKl+ISbpcKEBapyBx12k
KQYBVfV0S5dcXvjAUxVZezgz9ebuvO4E9ZJrVrG+8rAdCeOVttXwVGCsCYiEGTz+
2pUxTpbweqUixevSNHrFakYwmeDcHnyrTCu/KjdecHQfNBZMLmu6O6ooLmcoei6M
XZLTeJ5eSEEL3d9WWTrTIpuc2HzuGU1lfp+2+aqEs5K5mFyUH6xXEyt+G46ZXTjg
WYyPGwgxxPZJ1q2wS3ON8o+98i/o/L/LDqqrFwmdvY9OOI8hiTTHNA==
=SHPF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


If encryption is outlawed, only outlaws will have encryption...







Thread