1997-03-17 - Re: Dark Fiber Redux

Header Data

From: Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@el.net>
To: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Message Hash: aa7f95d7dcfac24137b29c54793b18ac706d17f3816ea69f6df995e4f079c1d5
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970317025954.144I-100000@void.el.net>
Reply To: <v03020900af51a5634a2b@[204.179.136.89]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-17 08:06:41 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 00:06:41 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@el.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 00:06:41 -0800 (PST)
To: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Subject: Re: Dark Fiber Redux
In-Reply-To: <v03020900af51a5634a2b@[204.179.136.89]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970317025954.144I-100000@void.el.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Robert Hettinga wrote:

-> In theory, at least, everyone gets a color, or frequency, and they listen
-> on that frequency for their inbound stuff. If you want to send someone
-> something, you literally tune them in and send it. Actually, I see these
-> frequencies using CDMA carrier waves when it eventually happens, but you
-> get the idea.

Wouldn't spread-spectrum have many advantages over the assigned frequency
scheme?


 ............................................................................
 . Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@el.net>      System Administrator        el Net .
 ............................................................................
 .   To him who does not know the world is on fire, I have nothing to say   .
 .                                                      - Bertholt Brecht   .
 ............................................................................






Thread