1997-04-11 - insecure algorithm (was: Re: [PGP-USERS] BestCryp NP)
Header Data
From: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
To: camcc@abraxis.com
Message Hash: 288a1826611fdd2735979522aaf6cd4a38e56c22c6ff48a0553a28e8e280f8c7
Message ID: <m0wFoFJ-0003b7C@ulf.mali.sub.org>
Reply To: <3.0.1.32.19970410171540.007ec650@smtp1.abraxis.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-11 22:20:02 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Raw message
From: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: camcc@abraxis.com
Subject: insecure algorithm (was: Re: [PGP-USERS] BestCryp NP)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970410171540.007ec650@smtp1.abraxis.com>
Message-ID: <m0wFoFJ-0003b7C@ulf.mali.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>>>BestCrypt NP costs $115, the home page is www.jetico.sci.fi.
>>>They even have our Mr Peter Gutmann on their credits list. BestCrypt
>>>supports BlowFish, DES (boo) and GOST, a russian standard with
>>>256bit key.
One would hope that they have also read and understood Peter's warning
about the GOST algorithm ("More thoughts on GOST", 17 Aug 1996,
<4v4ptc$42e@net.auckland.ac.nz>).
Thread
Return to April 1997
- Return to “3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)”
Return to “Alec <camcc@abraxis.com>”
- 1997-04-10 (Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:15:12 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [PGP-USERS] BestCryp NP - Alec <camcc@abraxis.com>
- 1997-04-11 (Fri, 11 Apr 1997 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT)) - insecure algorithm (was: Re: [PGP-USERS] BestCryp NP) - 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)