1997-04-08 - Re: Jim Bell raid

Header Data

From: Christopher Blizzard <blizzard@appliedtheory.com>
To: sergey@el.net
Message Hash: 687ae9a8c2cc95acc450ebf220d7a2e9c04142e70e45b9fc74ce50d038ae048c
Message ID: <199704081254.IAA13618@odin.appliedtheory.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970403153051.3400K-100000@void.el.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-08 13:55:05 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 06:55:05 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Christopher Blizzard <blizzard@appliedtheory.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 06:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: sergey@el.net
Subject: Re: Jim Bell raid
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970403153051.3400K-100000@void.el.net>
Message-ID: <199704081254.IAA13618@odin.appliedtheory.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message <Pine.LNX.3.95.970403153051.3400K-100000@void.el.net>, Sergey Goldga
ber writes:
:
:Jim Bell's essay is, IMO, definately free speech.  And, as you can see from
:the IRS Inspection report, he was not charged with anything relating to the
:essay itself.  In fact, the raid happened a long time after he published
:the essay, and may truely be unrelated.
:

Of course, the papers only talk about this.  Anytime they get to use two
cool buzzwords like "Interet" and "Militia", they're happy.  They're even
happier when they get to use them in the same sentince.  It'll sell.

--Chris

------------
Christopher Blizzard
AppliedTheory Communications, Inc.
blizzard@appliedtheory.com
------------





Thread