1997-04-03 - Re: PGP-Domo…

Header Data

From: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
To: harka@nycmetro.com
Message Hash: 8065fdbf1bcfe72cb662474ba31c1c1046b56d52c0d0ed966d1a2680106c4404
Message ID: <199704030045.AAA16111@mailhub.amaranth.com>
Reply To: <TCPSMTP.17.4.3.0.48.36.2780269260.1593210@nycmetro.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-03 06:33:03 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 22:33:03 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 22:33:03 -0800 (PST)
To: harka@nycmetro.com
Subject: Re: PGP-Domo...
In-Reply-To: <TCPSMTP.17.4.3.0.48.36.2780269260.1593210@nycmetro.com>
Message-ID: <199704030045.AAA16111@mailhub.amaranth.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



In <TCPSMTP.17.4.3.0.48.36.2780269260.1593210@nycmetro.com>, on 04/02/97 at
11:48 PM,
   harka@nycmetro.com said:


>On another mailing-list, there has been a lengthy discussion going on
>about encrypting the list-traffic or not.
>Although I personally agree, that encrypting a public mailing list is kind
>of useless I would like to know from a technical
>perspective if PGPdomo supports _both_ PGP and plain-text
>simultaneously on the same mailing list (if no public key
>available, send plain-text, otherwise encrypt).
>Also, considering the time it takes to encrypt/sign a message for each
>individual user (assuming they use pgp), isn't that too much overhead for
>the list-server, when we deal with a few hundred people and maybe traffic
>like on cypherpunks?

>Any experiences from PGP-Domo users/admins would be greatly
>appreciated.

I haven't used PGP-Domo but I have run a PGP mailing list using my own
software for OS/2.

You can cut down on some of the overhead by encrypting the message with
multiple keys but this increases messages size. If you have a large # of
subscribers you may wish to break up your encryption into blocks, say 25
keys per message. I think it will depend on your system on how may
subscribers & messages you could handle on a daily basis. Say a user base
of 1000 subscribers with 100 messages/day that's 100,000 encryptions per
day. While I think this would be doable on a PC you would have some
serrious lag. For a large subscription base I would go to a digest format.
This would cut down those 100 messages to say 5-10 digests. This would get
you to 5-10,000 encryptions which would be much more doable.

On the mailing list that I am running I only have 4-5 messages a day with a
user base of ~130 so volume has not been a problem. :)



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
                          
Finger whgiii@amaranth.com for PGP Key and other info
-----------------------------------------------------------






Thread