1997-04-30 - Re: Data Privacy Laws

Header Data

From: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9920c2681ba24e3493fd817e506ef21b90ccf9770ee4f8c0d344b919479a039a
Message ID: <m0wMOKd-0003b7C@ulf.mali.sub.org>
Reply To: <v03007800af8b4d0ada5e@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-30 01:39:35 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 18:39:35 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 18:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Data Privacy Laws
In-Reply-To: <v03007800af8b4d0ada5e@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <m0wMOKd-0003b7C@ulf.mali.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> >   According to the Registrar's office, anyone who is processing personal
> >   information, even as little as names and addresses received over the
> >   Internet, could find themselves facing an unlimited fine in the higher
> >   courts if they do not register with the Data Protection Registrar.

> This is well known to most of us. Still, we periodically get "privacy
> advocates" here on this list singing the praises of the various European
> "data privacy laws" and urging other nations to adopt the same sorts of
> laws.

It is worth noting that the "Data Privacy Commissioners" in Germany
(equivalent to the British Data Protection Registrar) are beginning to
advocate technologies such as anonymous e-cash, pre-paid chipcards,
pseudonyms, and of course encryption, rather than more laws.






Thread