1997-04-20 - Re: SSL weakness affecting links from pa

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: rachel@intertrader.com (Rachel Willmer)
Message Hash: af75c4531c842f9c1c1931d13e5a3abab5b278ff9101446da09e186139c05250
Message ID: <199704202021.PAA05908@homeport.org>
Reply To: <3.0.1.32.19970420202354.006ce42c@194.217.109.226>
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-20 20:26:22 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 13:26:22 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 13:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: rachel@intertrader.com (Rachel Willmer)
Subject: Re: SSL weakness affecting links from pa
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970420202354.006ce42c@194.217.109.226>
Message-ID: <199704202021.PAA05908@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Rachel Willmer wrote:
| At 09:34 19/04/97 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
| >	I'm suprosed no one has suggested paying people for
| >advertising.  
| 
| This is one of the more novel ideas that Digital have come up with for
| Millicent. 
| 
| In return for allowing the advertiser to download their advert to you, you
| get credited with an amount of scrip which is redeemable at their site. 

	At their site?  Feh.  Thats a coupon, not money.

	I was cash.  Cold, hard cash that I can spend on nifty toys.
Otherwise, what good do all those Microsoft cookies do me?  I accept
your cookie, I get paid for it.  If I don't buy your product, then,
heck, get yourself better advertising, or a better product.



Adam
-- 
	"Cash value 1/20th of a cent."







Thread